Howell Woltz
  • Home
  • Books
  • Film
  • His TEDX talk
  • Take Action
  • Contact
    • Press Releases
  • Blog
  • Epstein Log and Black Book

CONFIDENTIAL INTERVENTION PLAN FROM INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR JUSTICE- re: President Donald J. Trump

12/27/2019

5 Comments

 

                                              CONFIDENTIAL
                                Intervention plan proposed by
                           The International Centre for Justice
         To prosecute government officials and media co-conspirators
              For violations of Constitutional rights under color of law

Goals: 
1) Defend the President and other victims against a conspiracy between government actors to deny their civil rights under color of law and private actors who knowingly engaged in this conspiracy, in violation of 18 USC §241, which states:


§241. Conspiracy against rights:

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or
If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured-


They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

2) Bring to justice, those who criminally conspired to deny the President and others associated with his campaign, transition team and administration certain Constitutional rights and protections, with or without the voluntary assistance of the Department of Justice, pursuant to 18 USC §3332(a).

Victims of the Conspiracy-including but not limited to:
Donald J. Trump
Gen. Michael Flynn
Steven K. Bannon
Jared Kushner
Erik Prince
Rep. Devin Nunes
Carter Page
George Papadopoulos
Roger Stone
Paul Manafort
Sam Clovis
Dr. Jerome Corsi

American citizens illegally unmasked and/or spied upon and violated by members of the Obama Administration or their assigns without due process of law or predicate.

Co-conspirators* acting under color of law-including but not limited to:

Susan Rice
Loretta Lynch
Ben Rhodes
Hillary Clinton
Huma Abedin
Samantha Powers
Rosemary Collyer
Joe Biden
Barack Obama
Sally Yates
Dana Boente
John Brennan
Dennis Clapper
James Comey
Daniel Richman**
James Baker
Peter Sztrok
Lisa Page
Andrew McCabe
Bruce Ohr
Adam Schiff
Jerry Nadler

Nancy Pelosi
Harry Reid
David Kramer
Victoria Nuland
Amb. Marie Yovanovitch
Jonathan Winer
Michael Gaeta
Robert Mueller
Andrew Weissman
Rod Rosenstein
Jeannie Rhee
Aaron Zebley
Justin Cooper
Greg Andres
Andrew Goldstein
Kyle Freeny
Rush Atkinson
Zainab Ahmad
Kevin Clinesmith
Bruce Swartz
Joe Pientka
Amb. Michael McFaul
Kathleen Kavalec
Evelyn Farkas
Shailagh Murray
Eric Ciaramella
Alexander Semyon Vindman

And other co-conspirators of government acting under colour of law, both known and unknown.
* Many of these co-conspirators also violated 18 USC §242 by individually by acting to violate the rights of one or more of the listed victims under colour of law  and that charge should be considered and decided separately by the grand jury as well.
**Daniel Richman was conduit for FBI Director James Comey’s illegally leaked information but was also a special status employee of FBI, according to Director Comey, so his status as acting under color of law or conspiring with actors of government who were violating law, is unclear but his participation in the crime(s) is not.


Private Sector Co-conspirators aiding, abetting, and enabling Government conspirators to deprive victims of their rights, including but not limited to:
Adam Entous
Danny Yadron 
Nellie Ohr
Christopher Steele
Vyacheslav Trubnikov
Vladislaw Surkov
Alexander Downer
Robert Hannigan
Stephan Halper
Joseph Mifsud
Azra Turk (false name given by spy working with Stephan Halper)
Carl Bernstein
Manu Raju
Jeff Zucker
Don Lemon
Chris Cuomo
Maggie Haberman
Brian Stelter

CNN
Greg Miller
Ellen Nakashima
Devlin Barrett
Phillip Rucker
Joshua Partlow
Nick Miroff
Kevin Steff
Karen DeYoung
Rosalind Helderman
Tom Hamburger
Anne Applebaum
The Washington Post
Matt Apuzzo 
Sari Horwitz
Matthew Rosenburg
Mark Mazzetti
Michael Schmidt
Adam Goldman
Sharon La Franiere
Dean Baquet
The New York Times
Glenn Simpson 
Thomas Catan
Peter Fritsch
Neill King, Jr.
Joshua Levy
Marc Elias
Fusion GPS
John Podesta
Democratic National Committee
Benjamin Wittes
Daniel Jones
Edward Baumgartner
Democracy Integrity Project
Perkins Coie Law Firm (Receivers)
Baker Hostetter Law Firm
Natalia Veselnitskaya
David Corn
Mother Jones
Michael Isikoff
Yahoo News
Julian Borger
The Guardian
Peter Stone
McClatchy News
Ken Bensinger
Buzz Feed
Rachel Maddow
Mika Brzezinski
​Nicole Wallace
Joe Scarborough
MSNBC

Chuck Todd
NBC
Sidney Blumenthal
Cody Shearer
Geörgy Schwartz (a.k.a., George Soros)
And others who conspired with government actors, both known and unknown to violate the constitutional rights and legal protections of the victims by colluding in a criminal conspiracy with government employees and spies hired by them who were  by extension acting under colour of law.

PROCEDURE TO CHARGE
Government has shown an unwillingness to pursue criminals within its own ranks or those in media and the private arena who aid and abet criminal conduct.
This is the purpose of 18 USC §241 as it allows both government actors breaking law by violating the rights of citizens under color of law, as well as those in the private sector who join their conspiracy to be criminally prosecuted for their crimes.
PRESENTATION TO GRAND JURY
Government has also shown an unwillingness to seek an indictment against criminals within their own ranks, giving rise to 18 USC 3332(a), which requires the U.S. Attorney to present information of possible criminal conduct to a grand jury, that is brought to them by any attorney.

18 U.S. Code § 3332. Powers and duties
    (a) It shall be the duty of each such grand jury impaneled within any judicial district to inquire into offenses against the criminal laws of the United States alleged to have been committed within that district. Such alleged offenses may be brought to the attention of the grand jury by the court or by any attorney appearing on behalf of the United States for the presentation of evidence. Any such attorney receiving information concerning such an alleged offense from any other person shall, if requested by such other person, inform the grand jury of such alleged offense, the identity of such other person, and such attorney’s action or recommendation. [emphasis added]

This statute under Title 18 does not leave government a choice but to present.
This is perhaps the only path remaining whereby criminals in government and their co-conspirators within the media and private sector who aid and abet in these crimes, can be brought to justice.
The ideal conduits for this legal action would be:
 1.  Kashyap Patel, former Assistant U.S. Attorney, now working with Rep. Devin   Nunes, whose efforts uncovered much of this criminal conduct; 
2.    Judicial Watch; and/or
3.    Steven K. Bannon and his War Room, for publicity, in co-ordination with;
4.    Sidney K. Powell (currently representing conspiracy victim, Gen. Michael Flynn)
and/or any other group or individuals willing to help restore our nation and media to justice and integrity.

The International Centre for Justice stands ready to assist in specifying the overt acts in furtherance of the conspiracy of each co-conspirator, though it is public information in most cases, derived from books published below, with cites of specific overt acts listed by the authors.

Howell W. Woltz, Chairman
The International Centre for Justice
Tel. +48 604 900 183
howell@justicerestored.com

Sources


The Plot Against the President: The True Story of How Congressman Devin Nunes Uncovered the Biggest Political Scandal in US History, by Lee Smith


Spygate: The Attempted Sabotage of Donald J. Trump, by Dan Bongino


Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in The Department of Justice, by Sidney Powell


Exonerated: The Failed Takedown of President Donald Trump by the Swamp, by Dan Bongino


Secret Empires: How the American Political Class Hides Corruption and Enriches Family and Friends, by Peter Schweizer


Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency, by Andy McCarthy


The Russia Hoax: The Illicit Scheme to Clear Hillary Clinton and Frame Donald Trump, by Gregg Jarrett


Witch Hunt: The Story of the Greatest Mass Delusion in American Political History, by Gregg Jarrett


5 Comments

THE BIGGEST LIE UNDER THE SUN: The Global Warming Hoax Unveiled

3/21/2019

2 Comments

 
Picture
Picture

​Poor 'wooden' Al can't seem to catch a break. For eight long years they made him cover for charismatic horndog president, Slick Willie, who could make panties drop and women swoon even at a funeral.  Poor Al couldn't even keep his own wife.  Then they made him run for that office, which he actually won in the popular vote in 2000, but was robbed of it by just one vote at the Supreme Court.  "What now?," Poor Al wondered, knowing he was still under Faustian contract to the Dark Lord and a pact with the Devil is forever.

His next assignment was even worse.  They put him out front as lead spear-catcher in their latest scheme to rule the world-- "THE GLOBAL WARMING HOAX." Poor Al had no choice.  When the Dark Lord spoke, he had to jump.

The Lords of Darkness thought a couple of World Wars and some fairly serious genocide would do the trick to completely subdue us back in the 20th centruy, but it didn't so they decided to change up their game for the 21st, and get us to voluntarily put ourselves under their yoke. The new scheme--we'll give it code-name "Crispy Planet"--was created to manipulate world temperature data and produce the scariest ending imaginable--a world slow-roasting itself--and they would blame it all on us deplorable human cockroaches and our fossil fuels! "It may already be too late to save yourselves," we were told by Apostle Al, "but maybe, just maybe I know a guy, who knows a guy, who can save you!"



"One hundred and thirty-four
Trillion dollars, Mr. Gore!"




​​



​All we had to do, we were told, was give up everything that made life comfortable or enjoyable, and hand over our God-given rights to the Dark Lord. If we did that, these benevolent Globalist barons might save us, but we only had a few years to capitulate to their command--oh, and pay the $134 Trillion ransom under their Paris Climate deal, which was part of the scam--or they would just let us drown in our own waste and spawn as the waters rose to engulf us--or they would let us  fry to a crisp as the unyielding sun got ever hotter somehow. They weren't sure which, but it would be a terrible ending!

​According to Washington Post journalist, Ben Bagdikian, just 15 of these Progressive-Elite billionaire wanna-be Rulers control 82% of world media and are for the most part singing in unison, whatever the topic, which I suspect is not by accident. No matter which channel or network you turn on, they are even using the same text most days like a bunch of Mockingbirds, so it wasn't hard for this cohesive handful of Progressives to manipulate public opinion and they did a splendid job of it. Most people in the world now believe the Global Warming Hoax  rather than what they see with their own eyes and feel on their own skin every day.

As one Progressive of the National Socialist German Workers Party, Joseph Goebbels, was fond of saying, “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

Today's Progressives are students of Goebbels, so the few scientists back in 2001 who stood up against this Big Lie--the Global Warming Hoax--such as Dr. Keith Briffa and Professor Phillip Jones, were quickly beat back into submission. Ultimately they were  forced to falsify their own data to match the Big Lie. They were threatened with excommunication from the Church of Pseudoscience and warned that they would be cast into irrevelance in Global Warming Hell if they did not capitulate quickly.

​Most real scientists, however, are finally admitting that the Emperor is naked (though you don't hear much about that either). 31,487 real scientists--just in America--have signed a petition stating "there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane or greenhouse gases is causing, or will cause in the forseeable future, catastrophic rising in the earth's temperature."--while Al Gore and the Hole-in-the-Ozone Gang still claim "99.9% of them" are in unison that "Crispy Planet" is just a couple of Big Macs away due to farting cows and humans who like to breathe, eat, stay warm, and go places. 

Nobel Prize winning physicist, Dr. Ivar Gaiera, recently added his name and support to the Global Warming Petition, calling out the Globalist hoax to a completely deaf media--though it is one of the biggest pieces of news so far this century.  He revealed the truth about how the hoax came about back in 2001 saying that there were only 18 so-called 'scientists' who worked on this unsubstantiated allegation of human attribution in the first working group of the IPCC (Intergovernment Panel on Climate Change) report (#AR5) back in 2001.  Dr. Gaiera also  revealed not only their names (listed below), but that at least three of them were just students, not scientists.   I've yet to see Poor Al Gore's scientific credentials and we now know that the man behind his 'evidence' lied about his credentials. 

So let's take a look at the chart that Apostle Al and a man falsely claiming to be a "Nobel Prize winner", Michael E. Mann, used to fool the world--now famously known as "the hockey-stick graph"--ostensibly showing the world speeding to its end 20 years ago. This was achieved by manipulating the data, and completely leaving out numbers that did not match their thesis, including the entire Medieval Warming Period between 950 and 1250 A.D.--a time when it was so hot, that wine grapes were grown as far north as Runnymede, England--and the hottest years in recorded history, such as 1910 and 1944.  In short, it was a calculated fraud. 

Instead of "Crispy Planet", recent data shows that there has been no warming in 15 years and that the average temperature of the earth's surface has actually cooled by 1.4 degrees in just the past three.  Some scientists are now warning of a Mini Ice Age, while Globalists still cling to the hoax in hopes of fear-mongering their way into a modern form of feudalism with just  two classes as there were throughout most of human history--Ruling Elites and peasants--with no one in the middle (except perhaps their media and political lapdogs--gotta take care of the help, you know).

Picture

So where do we go from here?

That's the $134 Trillion question, isn't it? The hoax may have been a good thing in the long-run, as badly as I hate to admit it, as it has made all of us more aware of the consequences of our actions, and I'm still very worried about real environmental problems like the Great Pacific Garbage Patch  of floating plastic covering 1.6 million square kilometers in the Pacific Ocean, rapidly dropping underground water tables and the dangerous decline in bee populations.  These are actual problems in need of real solutions, but we can quit being audacious enough to think that we can destroy Mother Earth so easily with normal human behaviours and some extra carbon-dioxide, which makes plant life thrive.  Actual numbers show that we cannot, though we should treat our home with far more respect, and that will be my own takeaway from what has now been dubbed  “Climategate" by Dr. Art Robinson, the scientist who started the Global Warming Petition, calling out the hoax.


We can also stop worrying about overpopulating the planet, as absent parts of India and Africa, populations are actually declining or in free fall. Once these regions and societies advance even slightly--especially if the safety valve of flooding other continents with their unwanted is brought to a halt--they will  quickly realize what every other maturing society has learned, and be no different. 


Ancient towns in Europe, such as Sambucca, Sicily built by the Greeks and voted ‘most beautiful’ in Italy are selling empty homes and villas for as little as 1 Euro, just to get people to come there. Entire villages in France and Spain are uninhabited already, and the same will eventually happen throughout the world, especially if the Dark Lord loses to the Light and people outside these zones of over-breeding remain free.


The best way to save our planet is also the simplest.  Adam Smith gave us a formula for the success of any nation, "Peace, easy taxes, and a tolerable administration of justice.” Simple, right? But few nations have ever been true to these principles of success for long. Economic freedom, limited government, no more laws than absolutely necessary, and any place on earth will thrive and stay beyond the clutches of the Dark Lord’s desire to rule us. 


We will escape their latest attempt at world rule as well--and I give the new President of the United States, Donald J. Trump, much of the credit for that when he cancelled his nation’s participation in the Paris Climate Accord, putting the world on notice that he wasn't buying their story--and he's now been proven right.  The biggest hoax in human history has been unveiled for what it was.


Howell W. Woltz
The International Centre for Justice
Warsaw, Poland
www.justicerestored.com


Howell’s latest book—a novel—now available on Amazon, worldwide.

​
Picture
​NOTE: These are the 18 'scientist/students' who, according to Nobel Prize winner and physicist, Dr. Ivar Gaiever, started the Global Warming Hoax back in 2001. Make sure you don't hire them to work in your Donut Shoppe or for anything that requires math or integrity!:

Kabumbwe HANSINGO
Rachid SEBBARI
Suman JAIN
Krishna-Mirle ACHUTARAO
Robert VAUTARD
Peter STOTT
Myles ALLEN
Nathan GILLETT
David GUTZLER
Nathaniel BINDOFF
Gabriele HEGERL
Yongyun HU
Igor MOKHOV
James OVERLAND
Judith PERLWITZ
Xuebin ZHANG
Judith BARTHOLY
Tetsuzo YASUNARI
2 Comments

Rich Man, Not-so-Poor Man, Politician, Thief--All on the Taxpayer dole.

3/4/2019

1 Comment

 
Picture
Picture
Picture

And you pay for it.

While the latest Dem talking point is about a $15.00/hour minimum wage, it is actually a sick joke.  Why? Because welfare payments already exceed earnings under the proposed $15.00/hour minimum wage in most states (34/50) and are growing faster than working wages, even under the Trump Super-economy. So why take a 'pay-cut' by going to work for this $15/hour Dem giveaway (at someone else's expense), when you can sit on your butt watching TV at home and make $60,590 a year (Hawaii), $50,820 (District of Columbia) or $50,540 (Massachusetts) on the old Dem giveaway known as welfare?  

The answer is, you won't and you don't in most cases--you stay on the dole as your own self-interest would dictate--but let's leave the 'not-so-poor' on welfare alone for a minute as they are the cheapest screwing we as taxpayers are getting from the fools in Congress. Let's look at the real welfare gangsters--the super rich corporations and their owners, the politicians who created this mess, and other thieves--on both sides of the political aisle picking our pockets for insiders and as insiders.  Let's start with the Corporate thugs who bribed (a.k.a. 'donated') to members of Congress in exchange for special treatment at your expense.  Remember,  government can't  give anything to anyone without first stealing it from you--be it a privilege or money--so keep this in perspective. Government does not earn or make anything.  Government only  takes under color of law (threat of violence) and gives to someone else.  So my question is,  are you really OK with having money stolen from you, just to give to companies run by the world's richest men and women?  Do you really like subsidizing Jeff Bezos and the Walmart family with billions a year, just because they won't pay their employees a living wage? And that's just one type of corporate welfare where we're left to pick up their slack.  I for one, am not OK with that--and even living abroad, as an American citizen, I still have to pay U.S. taxes and I'm very mad about all this--as you should be whether left or right is irrelevant.

Senator Tom Coburn recently announced that corporate welfare has reached $154 billion a year, which is more than the budget of most nations, yet we're giving it to the world's richest people and companies instead of fixing our roads, bridges, broken schools, and inner cities. Why? The only possible explanation is so these extraordinarily wealthy entities will keep on paying bribes to their lackeys in Congress. I was chastised just last week and asked to quit calling corporate donations 'bribes' because it was only $2.5-$5 billion a year--"it's peanuts," I was told.  But in my world, if you can invest a nickel (peanuts) and get back $1.54 (an elephant) every year--a 3,000% return on your investment--that's better than a letter from a Nigerian prince, so I'll stick with the word "bribe," cause the Nigerian princes and princesses in DC actually send the millions and billions in exchange for the hundreds or thousands in seed money--and no offense or insult intended to Nigerians by comparing them to members of Congress.

Moving on, our next group of gangsters--the politicians--do this incredible impression of someone who cares while picking your pockets for all you're worth to give away to corporations and those unwilling to work. They actually do this at the same time they are robbing us blind for themselves as well.  To set the stage, we pay teachers an average of $40,065 a year and soldiers risking their lives on the battlefield, $38,000 a year, yet we pay each member of Congress $174,000--for life. You did not read that wrong--for life--while the Speaker of the House gets $223,500 (for life) and the Minority Leader $193,000--yes, for life.  Not bad work if you can get it, eh?  But the real sham is when they retire.  

Take Nancy Pelosi--you know, the goofy one that reminds you of some crazy old aunt that everyone dreads coming to Thanksgiving--but she's super-rich, powerful Crazy Old Aunt Nancy, so you invite her anyway, "What the hell--she can't be around much longer, can she.?" But when Crazy Old Aunt Nancy retires--which we can all hope is very soon--she will receive her $174,000 (as member of Congress) + $223,000 (as Speaker) + $193,000 (as Minority Leader)--after getting filthy stinking rich on insider deals, like post-IPO special shares for her husband in companies she regulated (VISA as example)--and draw it for life.  That totals  $803,700 a year--plus--her incredible health care benefits not available to us mere mortals who pay for all this slush.  

And that's the "thief" part in the title of this piece.  Suppose I told you that these same gangsters--a.k.a. members of the House and the Senate--were bought off to pass Obamacare in exchange for We the People paying not only their mandatory healthcare premiums, but those of their families and their staffs' families as well?  Yes. Republicans and Dems both took this bribe in exchange for passing Obamacare--but it's how they rigged it that was and is literally criminal fraud.  The White House cut a deal with both sides that Congress could apply to the local District of Columbia Obamacare exchange--where they thought they could keep it all a secret from us--and get this--the White House told them to apply as "a small business, with 50 or fewer employees."  The fact that Congress is not a 'small business' and has over 20,000 employees bothered no one, though it was in the law they just passed, so through criminal fraud in a collusion conspiracy with the Obama White House, they scammed the American people out of billions upon billions of dollars for their own personal gain--while forcing mandatory premiums on everyone else and making us buy their crap plan even if we did not want or need it.  All 535 members of Congress knew what was taking place so they are guilty of conspiracy as well as the fraud itself if they voted for it--or they are still guilty of conspiracy and  misprision of a felony for not exposing the crime--even if they voted against it. 

You haven't read about that in the papers, of course, and if not for Tom Fitton at Judicial Watch suing the Obama Adminstration for the documents proving it in federal court a few years ago, we never would have known it--but even now that J.W. recently won in court and published its findings, the silence is deafening.  Not even FOX is touching this one, which is disturbing in and of itself.  I'm going to try Dan Bongino today, but if anyone already has his ear, forward this to him immediately as people need to know what all of  them did to all of us.

So, to summarize, RICH MAN--getting richer.  NOT-SO-POOR MAN--not as poor as someone out there trying to work for a living. POLITICIAN--sinking to depths of depravity unknown in modern times, and THIEF--both Dems and Republicans in the greatest scandal in modern history, kept silent by the oligarchic media clique that also bribes them every 2 or 6 years to go easy by not enforcing Anti-Trust laws on the books for nearly a century.  It's a mess and We the People are funding it at the point of a gun.  If that sounds overly dramatic, try not paying your taxes for a few years and see what the guy is carrying when he comes to take your house and arrest you.

But the day of reckoning may be near for the Congressional MS-535 gang and it's called a Convention of States. Arkansas just became the 13th member of the Union to endorse this call to action last week.  Utah is set to be the 14th and the momentum is rapidly building while Congress is asleep at the wheel--and mistakenly thinks we are as well.  When 34 States pass this resolution, it by-passes Congress completely so  the States control the amendment process.  We are well on our way to that number. Unlike the media hype against it,  the Convention itself is limited only to motions and amendments that restrain federal government (so nothing to expand federal power can be submitted without calling for a separate COS--a process that takes years).

So please look up Convention of States right now (www.
conventionofstates.com), support it, and take heart that we still have hope.  That's why the Founding Fathers put Article V in the Constitution.  They knew back then that eventually, We the People, would have to re-take control and limit federal government once again.

Now is the time to do that--not later--now.

Howell W. Woltz
Author of Restoring America: by returning to its Constitution, and recent (first) novel, The Lawyers Guild--both available on Amazon.
1 Comment

A TALE OF TWO HARRYS: CAPITALISM V. SOCIALISM

2/16/2019

3 Comments

 
3 Comments

CONGRESS HAS FAILED AT OVERSIGHT—WHY NOT USE THE IGs?

2/15/2019

3 Comments

 
Picture
Organiser of coup d'etat against the President of the United States, Andrew McCabe, being escorted from FBI Headquarters ​after being fired for lying and ethics violations. 
    The FBI, CIA, NSA, IRS, and DOJ have proven incredibly obtuse and out-of-control since the Trump Revolution. Though Congress is their overseer by law, oversight has been met with partial or total obfuscation by every federal agency, not just the serial offenders listed above.
    At least two serial offenders—more likely three--were exposed just this week as having attempted to stage a coup of a duly elected President—using a now discredited hoax of their own creation as pretense. This is by the admission of the man who now publicly admits plotting the coup—disgraced former acting FBI director, Andrew McCabe.
    McCabe conspired with senior officials at the Department of Justice to set this operation in motion in something one might expect in a third-world dictatorship or  Serbia’s Black Hand traitors at the turn of the last century—yet none of these conspirators have found themselves under scrutiny for their crimes. McCabe was fired for lying and other ethics violations, while never investigated for his known and now admitted treason.
    From other investigators, we’ve learned that NSA Director, James Clapper, and CIA Director, John Brennan were also neck-deep in the ‘insurance plan’ to remove the president, with assistance from the Obama State Department to arrange visas for banned Russians suspected of espionage, to use in the set-up of the false narrative they intended to use to bring down the President of the United States—an unimaginable event—yet it happened and their conspiracy is now provable if not admitted.
    So until we have a Convention of States (or revolution) to rein in or unseat these unelected tyrants, what can we the electorate do about it? Unfortunately, most of our elected officials appear to be complicit (except their target, President Trump), so who or what remains in our constitutional republic to expose and oust these gremlins who think our government belongs to them?
    The only tool still more-or-less under the President’s control are the IGs—the Inspectors General—within his own executive departments who are authorised to have full investigative powers within their respective agencies. These Inspectors are nominated by the President and approved by the Senate, which is still under the control of his party—thanks largely to the Presidnet himself—certainly not through their own brilliance or great job performance. These IGs serve at the President’s pleasure, meaning he has the power to fire those currently sitting comfortably in those positions who are failing to do their jobs, and replace them with aggressive watchdogs who can get the documents and evidence of wrong-doing—perhaps criminal doings--necessary to clean house.
    There are 73 IGs with 13,500 employees working for them whom I suspect will be very difficult to motivate against their fellow Deep Staters, but the point is that there is no shortage of manpower to get this job done. Historically when even criminal wrong-doing is identified within these departments, the employee simply resigns, which ends the IG’s power to investigate them, so the rules will need to change so these citizens are treated like any others--immediate referrals for criminal prosecution as it is discovered, and as these same agencies do to We the People.
    It’s time to take off the gloves and give these departments oversight from within, since they stubbornly refuse to accept it from without. The days of ignoring subpoenas to appear before Congress, and either refusing to comply with document requests—or simply redacting, hiding, or (in the case of the evidence of Hillary Clintons criminal conduct) destroying documents, servers, and devices before it can be seen—must come to an end. Democracy only survives in sunlight.
​
Howell W. Woltz—Author of Restoring America: by Returning to its Constitution 
The International Centre for Justice
​Warsaw, Poland
www.howellwoltz.com
3 Comments

President Trump's Request

12/28/2018

0 Comments

 

President Trump is asking everyone to forward this email to a minimum of 20 people, and to ask each of those to do likewise. In three days, most people in the United States will have the message. This is an idea that should be passed around, regardless of political party.
The TRUMP Rules: Congressional Reform Act of 2017
1. No Tenure / No Pension. A Congressman/woman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay when they're out of office. And, no more perks go with them.
2. Congress (past, present, & future) participates in Social Security. All funds in the Congressional retirement fund move to the Social Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security system, and Congress participates with the American people. It may not be used for any other purpose.
3. Congress must purchase their own retirement plan, just as ALL Americans do.
4. Congress will no longer vote themselves a pay raise. Congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI or 3%.
5. Congress loses their current health care system and participates in the same health care system as the American people.
6. Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose on the American people (i.e. NO MORE INSIDER TRADING!!!).
7. All contracts with past and present Congressmen/women are void. The American people did not make this contract with Congressmen/women. Congress made all these contracts by and for themselves. Serving in Congress is an honor and privledge NOT a career.
The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators should serve their term(s), then go home and go back to work … not get all kinds of freebies. NO WONDER THEY’RE FIGHTING EVERYTHING HE TRIES! Pass it on!!!! Let's help TRUMP drain the swamp!! 

I received this tonight, and whether the President is behind it or not, it is time for this and the 25th Amendment, and I hope you will pass it on.

Howell W. Woltz
Author of "The Lawyers Guild"

0 Comments

"Progressive" Globalism v. Nationalism?

12/17/2018

4 Comments

 
I was kicked out of high school twice—first for taping Miss July 1968 to the Spanish teacher’s roll-up screen to surprise her when she pulled it down.  She was surprised, alright—as was I. The school suspended me, my father blistered my backside with a hickory-wood paddle, and my older brother pummelled me for helping his favourite playmate escape from under his mattress.  But the second time they kicked me out of school, it was over the meaning of words and their use out of context—a far more painful but instructive lesson. 

During Church, I imagined what an alien from another world or time would think of our sacrament of Communion.  I chuckled thinking how clever my story would be as our row was invited by the preacher to come to the altar and “drink the blood and eat the body of Christ.” 
The horrified alien described a ritual where people knelt under the murder weapon (a cross) that killed the man they were celebrating—by drinking his blood and eating his body.“And they called this ritual ‘Communion’.” My writing teacher was unamused and called for my expulsion for ‘blasphemy’, I got a first-rate flogging by Dad and work duty at Church for several weeks as penance. 

WORDS HAVE MEANING AND ARE POWERFUL


Words are powerful and it only takes a slight turn of the contextual prism to twist them from inspiration to heresy. As George Orwell wrote of the words of the Globalist cabal’s imaginary dictator ‘Big Brother’ in his novel 1984, “Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.” All one has to do is slightly twist the prism of context and a sacrament becomes an outrage. By changing the meaning of words, the minds of the populace can be easily twisted.
Globalist ‘Progressives’ put my high school antics to shame. These masters of Orwellian DoubleSpeak are revising time-honoured terms to advance their agenda. America’s first openly Progressive President, Woodrow Wilson, as example, opined in his 1913 book on this philosophy, The New Freedom, that American-style freedom was actually slavery. He got away with it because the 26 most influential news organisations in America had already been bought out by his mega-wealthy backer, J.P. Morgan, to advance the Progressive agenda (and Morgan’s own interests).

DECEITFUL FROM INCEPTION


The term Progressive itself, is actually the reverse of that word’s meaning as was intended by its  19th and 20th century proponents Herbert Croly, John Dewey, Walter Weyl and U.S. President Woodrow Wilson. It implies progress though completely ‘regressive’ in that its intent is to move mankind backwards. It is a socio-political construct of feudalism, originally taught in the late 1800s by Oxford University Professor John Ruskin—a wealthy elite Socialist—who instructed his privileged upper-class British students that due to their inherent superiority over all other races and cultures, they must bear the burden of ‘benevolent rule’ of the hairy unwashed of the world (recently updated to ‘deplorables’ by U.S. presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton). Professor Ruskin told his young upper-class snobs that such was their ‘duty’ and ruling the world was a burden they must bear as its Elites. 
THE ROOTS OF THIS EVIL RUN DEEP AND FAR INTO THE PAST

But there is nothing new or ‘progressive’ about this at all. Wealthy elites have ruled the world throughout most of human history. Taking us back to such was not moving our species forward, but rather putting mankind’s actual ‘progress’ into hyper-reverse. It took millennia for the ideas of equality, freedom and democracy to manifest—and just one century to put them asunder in so many ways under Globalist “Progressive” rule. 

And though Professor Ruskin was a self-described Socialist, he made it clear to the would-be Elitist rulers he taught at Oxford that he was not a believer in any positive aspects of Marxist Socialism, he simply saw these schemes as best for controlling the masses. The fewer choices or opportunities to participate the People have in governing themselves, the more easily they can be controlled by the Elites through a consolidated press and the puppets of their choosing. A wealthy minority subjugating everyone else is a concept as old as time and slavery, but giving it a perky DoubleSpeak handle like “Progressivism”—though wildly dishonest—was quite brilliant. 

Who at the dawn of the 20th century—or 21st for that matter—would not want to be part of anything that had progress in its name?  And as for the puppets they choose to put in office, who would not want to be told they were part of ‘the Elite’ rather than one of the deplorables?

Cecil Rhodes, one of Professor Ruskin’s students, was so enthralled with this concept of modern-day feudalism that he carried the notes from this particular lecture in his jacket pocket for the next 40 years, as he worked to fulfil that dream—becoming Sir Cecil Rhodes in the process—and one of the richest, most powerful men on earth or in history.
Rhodes and his upper class ‘Network’ as he called this cabal, organised the Boer Wars to seize the gold and diamond mines of South Africa to fund their cause. The booty did not go to the British Government or public treasury that fought and paid for these battles—no—it was used to control them and the press instead.  In fact, George Orwell was once part of the Network through The Fabian Society—a Rhodes construct—until he realised that there was nothing ‘benevolent’ about so-called “Progressivism”. His incredible novel, 1984, was what he imagined as the endgame of their plan for world domination.  It was the Rhodesian cabal’s design taken to logical fruition by a prodigious writer who knew it from actually being in the group.
THE RESULTS OF A CENTURY OF 'PROGRESSIVISM'

As if to live out Orwell’s predictive story, Rhodes-backed governments, revolutions, and politicians were responsible for the deaths of nearly 100 million human beings in the last century. ‘Benevolent rule’ has not worked out well for the underclass—but it made the Elites richer and more powerful than ever before as the tentacles of their regressive Order and transnational corporations wrapped themselves around the structures of power worldwide—both political and informational.  

Just a handful of such corporations today—Disney, Bertelsmann, GE,  NBC, Time-Warner, Viacom and Sony, to be precise—control over 80% of the content of all information sources worldwide, and over 92% in the U.S.  According to famous Washington Post journalist, Ben Bagdikian in his book The New Media Monopoly (2016), just 15 of the richest men and women on earth—all but one, a publicly avowed Globalist Progressive—control our public debate.  Accident?  Not hardly.

Since 2000, U.S. Presidents have threatened, harassed and jailed dissenters—including me—in service to these Globalists, citing ‘national security’—security from truth, I suppose, as I’ve yet to write an unverifiable fact but spent 87 months in prisons all over America, though never convicted in or by any court of jurisdiction for any crime. Only now that an outsider—Trump—has come to power, has this assault on freedom of the press ceased.  He doesn’t like the press and says so on a daily basis calling them “Fake News”, but unlike his predecessors, Trump does not put people in jail for disagreeing with him or use the press to misinform the public as the Progressives have for a century.

‘Progressive’ U.S. president George W. Bush used DoubleSpeak when he spoke eloquently of “exporting freedom” while he drove the United States from #1 in freedom of the press to 29th. His successor, Obama, spoke sweetly of “hope and change” while hopelessly plunging the United States even further to 49th place in service of Globalism under his unapologetically ‘Progressive’ administration.

In fact, most Progressive presidents since Woodrow Wilson have twisted words into lies to start wars for resources or to create unholy alliances to advance Globalism, while abandoning ancient allies when they became uncomfortable associates in the One World Order scheme. Franklin D. Roosevelt, as example, abandoned America’s oldest ally, Poland, to curry favour with the Progressive-inspired Soviet empire—originally funded by the Rhodes Network as well—a little discussed fact today, but one of historical importance. Leon Trotsky was actually in New York being wined and dined by America’s Progressive Elites—just one of whom (Jacob Schiff) contributed over $20 million to the ‘revolution’ Trotsky was credited with starting—but never attended. Trotsky was sipping champagne with J.P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, and Paul Warburg while the blood was being shed in St. Petersburg—all paid for by their ‘Round-Table Group’, which later became the Council on Foreign Relations.  Why didn’t you hear about this in school?  Good question.
Like President Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt preferred murderous dictators and Progressive Elite-chosen brother-in-arms such as Joseph Stalin to America’s historical allies, just as President Bush chose Saudi/Muslim dictators for his wars, and Obama chose his Iranian Islamic friends over Western Civilisation’s only true ally in the Middle East—Israel.    
THE RESULTS ARE IN --AND THEY ARE NOT GOOD

Freedom has eroded in equal proportion to Progressive’s successes. As example, the Administrative State in America has outlawed 314,000 human behaviours—most of them during my lifetime. These carefully contrived statutes against once-normal behaviours are selectively used to punish enemies of Progressivism.  Have you released a mammal from a net? (used to target conservative self-sufficient outdoorsmen, hunters and fishermen).  Have you collected rainwater off your own roof? (used to target rural conservatives). Have you ‘mistreated a mailbag’? (used to remove non-Progressives from the federal workforce). Have you tried to drain a mud puddle on your own property? (used against non-Progressive landowners to seize or control their land under Obama’s “Agenda 21”). Have you ever mentioned thinking of committing one of these heinous acts to anyone else?  If so, then you are guilty of ‘conspiracy’ which often carries a longer sentence than actually violating one of these “laws” designed solely to trap the enemies of so-called Progressivism.  

Am I overstating the case? Can it really be this bad?  According to a Harvard Law School study cited by Attorney Harvey Silverglate, in Three Felonies a Day (2009), the answer is “Yes.”  The average American violates three of these ridiculous laws a day and doesn’t even know it.  Why? Because they are so obscure and ridiculous, no reasonable person could suspect the activities outlawed to be ‘criminal’. 

This leaves Progressive prosecutors free to simply choose their targets and then fill in the crimes, which is perhaps the best description of the American system of ‘justice’ today, (and why that nation elected a non-Progressive outsider like Trump to undo this horrific mess). The Trump Administration is thankfully undoing these outrageous grabs of sovereignty and freedom at an incredible rate of 22 repeals for every 1 added—which has infuriated the “Progressives” of both parties who spent a century undermining the American Republic to establish rule-by-Elites. Trump is taking away their tool of mass-incarceration-through-bureaucracy, which is why they are violating every law and principle themselves to destroy him.
Progressives have robbed over 71 million American adults—approximately one in four—of their constitutional rights of citizenship just since I was in high school using this malignant form of rule by ruin. When more human behaviours are forbidden than allowed, ‘freedom’ is nothing more than a useful myth and when ‘law’ is used selectively as a tool to remove dissent and dissenters, it has become dangerous in and of itself.
THE LATEST VICTIM--NATIONALISM

Our beautiful word Nationalism is just the latest victim of DoubleSpeak wankery by Globalists. Their unhinged “Progressive” followers in the State of California recently suggested making it a crime to describe oneself as a Nationalist.  Just one president ago, they might have gotten away with it because Nationalism is defined as “Devotion and loyalty to one’s own country, patriotism,” which was certainly not President Obama’s sentiment. Progressive pundit/puppets now claim nationalist is somehow a racist term, though every federal employee and Progressive president in America swore an oath to put their own nation above all others as did yours—that’s their bloody job—yet this term has been tragically twisted to mean hating one’s fellow citizens rather than loving his or her own nation—which is a lie. 

‘Nationalist’ was intentionally disparaged by Progressive French President Macron recently, saying it was the exact opposite of its actual meaning—patriotism—likening it to treason instead. Perhaps President Macron is  rethinking his intentionally misleading words now that Paris is in flames and his own tenure as the head of the French Republic he seeks to subdue to EU rule is in ruins. 

THE DANGERS OF DOUBLESPEAK

“War is Peace”; “Ignorance is Strength”; “Freedom is Slavery”;—and now “Nationalism is Treason.” Too stupid to merit serious contemplation, but a dangerous practice in the hands of Globalist ‘Progressives’ like Macron, Merkel, May and others, whose Globalist Masters control 80% of the world’s press and are leading the charge toward One World Order—under them. 


And the new media of social platforms are under the control of Globalist Progressives as well. The world’s (almost) exclusive search engine—Google—recently redefined ‘Fascism’—the Left-Wing Italian Marxist Party policies of Benito Mussolini—as a “Right-Wing” construct so that the term could be screamed by domestic terrorist groups such as Antifa and Democratic Socialists of America at President Trump, though his philosophy is its antithesis. Next, the EU will be calling the Yellow Vests in Europe, “Fascists” for wanting to keep their own countries and ways of life. 
Who in global media caught this sleight of hand by Google?  Apparently none. Either out of ignorance or complicity nothing was said and I only noticed it because I’ve been tracking these changes, but overnight just weeks ago, Google sua sponte revised the meaning of Fascism from Left-Wing Socialism—as defined by its founders in the 30s and 40s, to ‘Right Wing’ allowing the press, as if on cue, to apply the term to their conservative enemy of the moment—Donald Trump.  

Globalist news parrots such as CNN in the U.S. and Bertelsmann-owned media in Europe now spit this re-labelled term “Fascist|” at any who do not toe the line of DoubleSpeak, making themselves the real Fascists of press and power. This once-unimaginable Orwellian world is now upon us. Consolidated media and social platforms under the control of a handful of self-anointed Elites have become ‘Big Brother’ in every Orwellian sense.  
AND NOW THE GOOD NEWS

But the tides may be turning. A Disruptor intent on wresting America back from them became President of The United States against all odds, and those of his nationalist ilk are seizing power throughout the world as the huddled masses (deplorables) are once again yearning to be free. They are choosing freedom and love of their own nations over the dark practices of Elite-rule known throughout most of the human experience, even as the high Priestesses of ‘diversity’ condemn them for wanting to remain—well—‘diverse’.  

The Globalists were about to win the end game—until Trump.  His brash style and refusal to bow to the Elites has infuriated them, but it has also sparked a revolution that is  spreading throughout the world. Since he became president, Italy, Austria, England, France, Sweden, Czech Republic, Holland, Slovakia, Hungary, Poland—even Germany—have begun feeling the winds of nationalism stirring once more and a pride of homeland swelling in the hearts of those who do most of the living and dying in those countries.

And none too soon. When Big Brother starts re-writing the dictionary, the history books, tearing down statutes of heroes, and changing the meaning of words that have served us well for centuries, it is time to wake up as the house is on fire.  The dangers of allowing this usurpation of language are the most severe in my opinion, so I will end by saying that I am a proud nationalist—not a racist, not a bigot, not a homophobe or a misogynist—I simply love my country. That is all the word nationalist means—loving your nation and putting its interests above others. I will continue to proudly use the word as such, as should all of us.

Howell W. Woltz,
Author of “The Lawyers Guild” (a novel released this week on Amazon, where Globalism is defeated!)

Amazon’s description of THE LAWYERS GUILD--George Soros has been arrested. Paris is in flames and Angela Merkel has been deposed. The American Spring has begun and the Globalists are finally on the run, worldwide. Thousands of Deep State operatives are at Ft. Belvoir in the U.S. awaiting trial and the man who started the fall of Globalism--Donald Trump--and his unlikely band of "deplorables" known as The Lawyers Guild, are the only ones left standing. NOTE- This novel is historical fiction, but every fact, legal cite and historical note regarding Progressivism and its roots has been rigorously vetted by The International Centre for Justice for veracity, which wrote, "This novel is not only innovative in style but content and robs the Progressives of their figleaves—with fact wrapped in a rollicking good story.”

ORDER YOUR COPY TODAY!


https://www.amazon.com/Lawyers-Guild-Howell-Woltz-TEP/dp/1983564273/ref=sr_1_9?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1544968339&sr=1-9&keywords=Howell+Woltz




​


4 Comments

BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP-THE FACTS

11/3/2018

2 Comments

 
THE LAW REGARDING BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP
Administrative agencies of the American Federal Government since the passage of the 14th Amendment, have excluded foreigners and their children by race, creed, and color—including the total abolition of Chinese (The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882) and Japanese (Asian Exclusion Act of 1924) from becoming United States citizens. These examples bring great skepticism to the current debate raging in America, as today, we find the opposite interpretations of these same Amendments and Supreme Court decisions from the 1860s and 1880s, respectively, to mean that open borders are a human right for anyone, from anywhere, with any agenda--even ideologies hostile or dangerous to America and its principles. 
Open Border advocates claim if a person can cross the U.S. border—legally or illegally--and drop their spawn, they add that child to the American taxpayer’s burden forever. No questions allowed by Progressive fanatics of the Administrative State or Mainstream Media—both of which once held the opposing view.  
In fact, the same political party which decried this “Birthright Citizenship” as ‘an outrage’ as recently as 1990s (Democrat Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid) when it was not working in their party's favor, now holds “Birthright Citizenship” to be a sacrosanct human right.  Immigrants coming then were largely seeking opportunity not a handout—and therefore more likely to vote Republican—but the incredibly generous giveaways of today attract a very different group of immigrants—more likely to be Democrats—thus the change in that party’s stance on the issue.

This madness prompted me to study the issue in depth and try to figure out how such an inane policy could possibly exist.  It is admittedly an emotional, politically-driven debate, whose players keep switching sides, depending on the politics of the moment—and all of their interpretations appear to be wrong.
SO WHAT ARE THE FACTS?

The facts reveal a more sensible truth.  
FACT—It is true that the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution granted the right for those born in the United States to become citizens, as a means of forcing the instatement of citizenship for black Americans born on American soil who were victims of enslavement. This amendment actually fulfilled the Founders’ promise of equal treatment under law for Americans.  
FACT— That same Amendment excluded Native Americans and women indicating  considerable limitations were intended.  Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg recently acknowledged this uncomfortable truth in an interview—during which she forgot what the Fourteenth Amendment was about but was reminded. A member of the audience gave her a copy of the Constitution she swore to uphold—but apparently, rarely uses.  (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKJ8j-FokCI).
FACT—Just two months before the adoption of the 14th Amendment in 1866, Congress also passed the Civil Rights Act to address the same issues and declared “all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign powers, excluding Indians not taxed” to be citizens.  If Congress did not intend for the original owners of America’s vast landscape to be citizens, granting that to all others, seems a bit of a stretch. Further, the phrase ‘subject to foreign powers’ clearly excludes any who come to the United States illegally as they  are still subject to the jurisdiction of the nations from which they came or were born. 

SO WHERE IS THE PROBLEM?
The hard hike uphill to the truth gets even trickier, as the last seminal decision on this issue harkens back to Supreme Court decision Wong Kim Ark from 1898, when the court ruled that since Wong Kim Ark was born to parents who were in America legally at his time of birth, he was, in fact, a U.S. citizen, even though the laws later passed by Congress denying his entire race citizenship, were in force upon his return to the United States from China. 

The “Kim” ruling of 1898 decided that: 
‘Upholding the concept of jus soli (citizenship based on place of birth),[116] the Court held that the Citizenship Clause needed to be interpreted in light of English common law,[117] which had included as subjects virtually all native-born children, excluding only those who were born to foreign rulers or diplomats, born on foreign public ships, or born to enemy forces engaged in hostile occupation of the country's territory.’[118][119][120] The ruling further required birth citizens to have “a permanent domicile and residence in the United States.” 
Even the most elastic interpretation of this ruling would indicate that people illegally invading America to occupy even a square meter of the country’s territory would qualify for exclusion from ever holding legal status or their children having any birthright to citizenship. The further requirement to have “residence”and a "domicile" in the United States—meaning that the parents must hold lawful status to reside in the nation and have a place to live when birthing children—is inescapable. Simply sneaking across the border or setting one foot on U.S. soil to make their offspring a citizen does not qualify.  This should end the question for all times—but that is not likely, as immigration is the only life raft keeping the ‘Progressive’ Democrat Party afloat in America today. 
WHERE ARE WE NOW? 
President Trump, given the seriousness of this issue and the ineptness of  Congress to act on it, has promised an executive action—which will be immediately challenged by his opposition in the life raft (and the mainstream media that does most of its paddling). The President therefore needs to prepare for the inevitable court battle to prevent any of the invading ‘caravans’ from ever becoming residents or citizens by focusing on their stated intent to wilfully violate U.S. borders. That should determine them to be “enemy forces engaged in hostile occupation of the country’s territory.” 
This 7,000 strong force of mostly young men between the ages of 18 and 24 have already broken through/invaded/violated the borders of either one or two nations, depending on whether they are Honduran or Guatemalan—and how Bangladeshis and Syrians came to be among them is yet to be determined—but they are, indeed, in the so-called ‘caravan’ as well.
Violently breaking through international borders, tearing down barricades and openly and notoriously violating the laws of Nations, while admittedly on the way to do so in yet a third or fourth nation to literally steal benefits, qualifies as ‘hostile’ and when financed by America’s enemies, it is rightly described as a ‘force’ with ill intent.
It was also revealed this week that molotov cocktails (gasoline bombs) are being produced to be used at Mexico’s Southern border by the next group of invaders to force entry, and weapons are being gathered just south of our own border by forces hostile to America, for a confrontation at the destination border—ours.

SHOW ME THE MONEY
The funding for this 7,000 strong force, therefore, is quite relevant to the President’s argument as well, which is perhaps why no Progressive media has questioned how 7,000 people are fed, watered, toileted, and feted each day, to survive a 2,500 mile march. Now we know. 
The money is coming from two Marxist dictators ‘hostile’ to the United States.  The President of Honduras officially advised U.S. Vice-President, Mike Pence this week that his government can prove funding is coming from the Marxist regimes of Nicolás Maduro (Venezuela) and Miguel Díaz-Canel (Cuba) to finance this mercenary force marching on the United States.  
This is actually a brilliant move in my opinion, though I abhor the use of poor people as pawns in a dangerous game of global politics by foreign dictators. For the cost of less than one bunker-busting bomb, however, these two dictators will cost the American taxpayers 1) hatred from the world community, and 2) they will impose a financial burden on the American taxpayers for a century.  
This is brilliant. They are undermining their enemy for a pittance.  If their cause was for actual freedom rather than Marxist oppression, I’d be their greatest advocate—but they are not for that.  They are simply using poor, oppressed people to further their Marxist ideology and bankrupt America—and their comrades on America’s Left appear to be in goose-step with them.
WHAT IS THE REAL COST OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION?
In the President's argument should also be mention of the cost. Hispanic columnist, Sara Gonzales, recently reported on the pricetag of illegal immigration alone—which does not include those who enter the United States legally. The numbers are staggering:

“The Federation for American Immigration Reform — or FAIR — released a comprehensive report Wednesday on the rising cost of illegal immigration. Here are the numbers you should know:
Total government expenditures on illegal immigration: $134.9 billion per year
Total federal costs: $45.9 billion
● Education costs: $1.7 billion
● Medical costs: $17.1 billion
● Justice system costs: $13.1 billion
● Welfare programs: $5.9 billion
● General expenditures: $8.1 billion
Total state and local costs: $89 billion
● Education costs: $44.4 billion
● Medical costs: $12.2 billion
● Justice system costs: $10.9 billion
● Welfare costs: $2.9 billion
● General expenditures: $18.6
Though many immigration advocates believe these expenditures are offset by the taxes paid into the system by illegal immigrants, FAIR’s report shows that even when considering total taxes paid by illegal immigrants at both federal and local levels, the deficit is staggering, with the costs outweighing the taxes paid into the system by a 7-to-1 ratio.”
If someone successfully breaks into my home, that does not automatically make them a part of my family. If someone successfully breaks into my nation, that does not make them—or their child—my fellow citizen, and we should not have to spend this money to support them.  
Both are criminals—for whom I have great sympathy, as my writings attest—but I do not defend those who intentionally violate the laws of nations—or the sanctity of my home, and in fact, I very much equate the two.  
WHAT DOES THE PRESIDENT NEED TO DO?
By declaring this invasion (or any who violate our borders) as ‘hostile', he is covered.  He should also cite and enforce the Supreme Court decision in “Wong Kim Ark” that parents must have residency and a domicile  in the United States before their child is born to qualify for Birthright Citizenship. 
If the invaders cannot show residency papers or legal domicile, then foreign eggs and sperm blended have no right to anything in the United States, only their own nations are responsible for those zygote(s) and children.  
This has no affect on the rights of legal immigrants. They can apply at a port of entry and if accepted, their children will automatically become citizens when born on U.S. soil, but if not, the President can stop them, arrest them, imprison them, and send them back, with prejudice—meaning they can never return again or be considered for entry into the United States—and neither can any nappy-wearers they disgorge during their stay on President Trump’s soil. Period.
He has every right to do what he is doing, under law decided in the 1800s.
THE SOLUTION
Congress needs to address all of these issues and update America's policies by law, ending any reasons for coming to America other than to benefit our nation.  Further, are we to allow any and all to invade our nation, just because they have allowed their own leaders to impose less successful policies and stultifying Middle Age ideologies on them where they were born?
In answer, we should not.  People need to sort out their own governments, not just flee them seeking ‘asylum’ in those that used human freedom and its inevitable results to their benefit. 

Get rid of your dictators, and put these same ideas to work in your nations. The miracle can happen there, but for God’s sake, do not come to ours and try to change us.  We’re fine. It’s you who have done this to yourselves, or allowed it.  We revolted against it and used these simple ideas to create the greatest nation on earth. Why don’t you?

But as the law stands today, the President has every right to stop it if he words the order with the correct terminology.
Howell W. Woltz
Author of "Restoring America: by returning to its Constitution." Watch for Howell's new novel "The Lawyers Guild" which will be available in late November.


2 Comments

THE TOUGHEST OF QUESTIONS

10/23/2018

1 Comment

 
TOUGHEST OF QUESTIONS—WHAT DO WE DO ABOUT THE INVASION?
I am an immigrant—to Poland—so it would be unfair to characterise me as xenophobic or anti-immigrant—as the old joke goes, “I are one.” I came to Poland legally, or it is unlikely I would still be here.  Unlike America, the laws here are tough and they are enforced.  I am married to a Polish citizen, yet that does not mean that I can ever be one.
To be considered for citizenship, I must first live here supporting myself for at least five years—asking nothing from government—before I can even apply for any status but temporary residency, and I am not allowed to take any job that could be taken by a Pole, including a fairly long list of them. Fair enough.
Second, I must become fluent to the B1 level in this language, which now ranks as the most difficult on earth (it was Mandarin, but it was simplified many years ago, leaving Polish as the toughest). I expected the same of those who migrated to my country, so rather than complaining, I’m complying. 
And as simple courtesy, being an immigrant, I don’t try to tell these people how they should do things, run their country, or try to force my ways and foreign ideas on them—as certain ideologies now assert the right to do in America.  The Poles don’t allow it, and if I came for that reason, they think I should be rejected and deported, but  If I want to live among them as a Pole, I am welcome. 

RESULTS OF SENSIBLE IMMIGRATION POLICIES
And guess what?  Not a single terrorist act has ever occurred on Polish soil, there is almost full employment, and this nation was just rated the ‘safest for women’ in Europe.  Could these policies and outcomes be related? You bet.
And I don’t consider any of these requirements to be anything but reasonable or sensible. That is actually the way most of the world handles this question, outside of Prog-run ‘no-border’ nut farms, all of which are presently being overrun by those hostile to their way of life--but too weak to resist them or save their cultures. 
We Americans had a long history of being welcoming to all who wanted to come and help us build our nation or contribute to that effort.  Like Poland, no one was given a handout or a leg up except perhaps by the Church or charities—all voluntarily.  No one tried to force us to bow to their cultures or support them—they came to America to be like us.  To be part of us.  And that system worked well, only attracting those who wanted to be here for the right reasons rather than for a handout.  They just wanted an opportunity, and they became one of us quickly, rather than being used to divide us as Americans for political purposes, or ask us to teach them and the next generation of their family in their own language or former cultural surroundings and mores. 
Immigrants had to learn our language and be productive or starve, like I am doing now in Poland.  No one else was forced to pay for them or made to feel guilty for asking them to pay their own fair share.

WRONG INCENTIVES, BAD RESULTS
Fast forward to the American Welfare State and the reasons people give for migrating to our nation and you will find that they are vastly different.  I know, as I spent seven years being moved 29 times between ICE detention centres all over America with mostly Hispanic immigrants from Honduras, El Salvador and Mexico and I know their reasons for coming to the United States from living with them, helping them on their legal cases, and hearing their stories, as editor of the hispanic prison newspaper, Despierta America!. 
The reasons stated were generally not good ones or positive for our nation.  Mainly, it was to sell drugs or access our generous welfare system—but again—those were the immigrants already arrested for murder, rape, robbery or drug crimes.
So when the Clintons, Pelosis and Schumers try to tell me they are all warm and fuzzy simply wanting to do jobs Americans won’t do, I know better. Anybody leaving an American prison would take any job he could, so I know that’s a lie, and I watched nine men carried out on stretchers, in wheelchairs, and in chains just one morning over breakfast when rival hispanic gangs had a rumble. 
The MS-13 men who started it screamed their gang motto “Murder, Rape, Control!,” while knifing their opponents with sharpened toothbrushes and ‘shivs’.  The motto has been recently modified to “Murder, Rape, Conrol, Repeat” but you get the picture.
I knew many of the human traffickers as well from Guatemala and Honduras  from having worked on their cases (which probably kept me alive, as I was useful to them) but nice or well-intentioned about our nation, are not words I can apply to any of those men I met. 

THE REAL REASONS FOR THESE UNSAFE POLICIES IN AMERICA 
While Jeff Bezos’ employees at the The Washington Post, and Chicago Op-Ed pieces (May 9th, 2018) try to tell us that America is safer  with illegal immigrants, that is an outright lie that Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton can debunk for them with the actual numbers.
Statistically, an illegal alien is three times more likely to commit a felony according to his agency--the one that arrested and prosecuted them--and I believe the State of Texas over Jeff Bezos/Soros gang on the left who are promoting this invasion, or anything the Koch Brothers want to preach on the right to talk us into accepting this nonsense, after my own experiences.  I lived with them.
If the Bezoses, Soroses,Kochs, Waltons and others of their enormous wealth really cared so much about people, why are we subsidizing their employees with food stamps and welfare to the tune of $150 billion a year?
‘Public records obtained by the New Food Economy, a nonprofit news organization, show that thousands of Amazon employees rely on the government’s Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) to make ends meet. As many as 1 in 3 Amazon employees in Arizona — and about 1 in 10 in Pennsylvania and Ohio — receive food stamps, according to an April report by the New Food Economy, based in New York.’  
Bezos’ workers are so poorly paid that we have to take care of them and the Koch brothers only want cheap(er) labor.  Soros just wants to disrupt America and take down its Constitution by any means necessary and all  are willing to put those who do not live in their gated communities at risk for their own agendas, and I say shame on them and the politicians they own on both sides, who would rather take their money, than protect us and our families--or America. 

SO WHAT DO WE DO?
Is it ‘cruel’, as we are being told, to want to keep our own American culture and maintain a reasonable standard of life and living for our own children?  If so, I’m so tired of the mush mouth nonsense about foreign 'children’ (and everything but the truth) that I really don’t care any more.  I’m more worried about the 1,200 Texas mothers whose babies were killed by illegal aliens just since 2011, than the babies the gangs dropped off at our border years ago, many of whom did it.  Yes, an estimated 30% of those murders were committed by so-called ‘Dreamers’ who were actually ‘Nightmares’—again, according to the government of Texas that arrested and convicted them.
If it’s just about cheap labor for the super-rich and votes for the plutocrats and Progs, I say let’s #stoptheflood.  What about us? 
But since when did you hear of a politicians who really cared or listened to We the People if the Bezos/Soros/Walton/Koch billionaires demanded something against OUR wishes?  It's like no one cares--and I suspect they don't.  

87% of us want stronger immigration rules and borders while both sides of the aisle in Congress just yawn and push it down the road—promising every two years they’ll fix it, just to get re-elected.  Why do we keep on believing them?  It’s crazy.
It’s time we called for a Convention of States (www.conventionofstates.com) and got them back in line by making it illegal for any politician to take a dime except from warm-blooded, breathing human beings who have the right to vote in their districts. A single penny from a Corporation, foreign government, PAC, union, or even a political party to buy their loyalty away from us—their real constituents—should send the giver and receiver to jail.

And until we get over our socialist experiment under Progressive rule and get real once more, we need borders that are impenetrable; we need smart policies that allow only immigrants who can support themselves or contribute to our nation (rather than expecting something from us); and they all need to take a pledge to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States, which if they ever violate—such as promoting anti-American groups or ideologies—is cause for them to be returned to their nation of origin upon evidence of this.

WHAT ABOUT THE INVASION ON ITS WAY RIGHT NOW?

To stop the hordes of --most recently estimated at 10,000-14,000-- currently on their way to invade the United States, it’s time to not only deploy the military, but to make it more difficult to get through to the border itself, until sensible immigration policies are restored and enforced.
Congress should step up and officially declare this a war (something they have not had the courage to do since WWII, by the way) as this is just that—a war.  It’s an invasion.  We’ve been threatened, we’ve been warned, and they’re on the way with pitchforks to the castle right now. Thanks to the limp-wrists and Bezos-Koch ‘suckers’ (take it any way you want to) in Congress, they can just walk across and our pathetic laws will make it a costly hassle to get even a few of them back to their home nations--by intent.  Those are Koch workers and Nancy voters--and both say the hell with us. 
The Army Corps of Engineers’ mission is to "Deliver vital public and military engineering services; partnering in peace and war to strengthen our Nation's security” and they should be deployed to the border immediately, to construct barricades just as our nation used in other times of war.  While that may sound cruel, it is the only way to prevent or even slow down those who would storm our nation   illegally.  Those who make it through knowing that we have deemed them hostile, should be immediately arrested and made prisoners of war—with no rights of any kind to ever live among us now, soon, or ever. That will put a stop to it.
This will not be popular, but stringing that razor wire and building those makeshift barricades—upturned bridges used by Seabees could even work—anything, until the President gets his wall—but anything at all that will stop those who care about themselves or their families from trying to come through is good.  Those that do—well that’s on them, not the President. They came in as hostiles, and they should be treated as such--no rights except under the Geneva convention as POWs.
But without some spine in Congress to back the President and a resolution or declaration of war to officially identify these invaders as the hostiles that they are—and give him powers to detain them without rights or regress other than deportation or incarceration—then they have put us all at risk and it’s on Congress—not the President.
The RINOS and PROGS want this invasion simply to hurt the President, knowing that if he actually acts in his nation’s best interest he will be vilified, and may both groups on right and left rot in Hell for such self-serving cynicism, while doing great harm to our nation and its people.
We need to give the president a team--no more Flakes, McCains, and Corkers of the Right, and no more Progs on the left. It's time for all of us, black, white, brown, yellow, red or green--I don't care what color--but it's time for all Americans who like being that, to come together and get this fixed on November 6th.


Howell W. Woltz
The International Centre for Justice
Warsaw, Poland


Author of “Restoring America: by returning to its Constitution” (2018) and a new novel “The Lawyers Guild” which will be released in November of this year.




1 Comment

Interesting News on Kavanaugh Accuser

10/13/2018

2 Comments

 
INTERESTING NEWS
First of all…I did not like Brett Kavanaugh because he was a Bushite who helped justify the Iraq war and then suggested to Chief Justice Roberts that if he called Obamacare a ‘tax’ so they could sneak it through.  Trying to take off a bathing suit top as a teenager—well, every man I know tried that (but him, apparently)—so let’s look at what may have brought this sudden attack of conscience on months after reported to Feinstein and gang (and 34-36 years after she alleged it happened).  

Anyone who says “We must believe them all!”, please read the Duke Lacrosse Case where the ‘victim’ had 23 different DNA-tested semens in her vagina—and none of them was from the three men she accused. One of the accused was photographed by a bank machine far away when the woman who had been with 23 men earlier that same day having sex for money, alleged he/they ‘raped her.’  Call me a bit jaded, but I’ve worked on too many cases of wrongful conviction to buy just any story without a little corroboration.  Rape?  Bad.  False accusations? Also bad, which is why we have due process.

But why did she come forward now? First of all, she never even alleges rape or anything close to it, only that she thought it was going to happen.  As someone who has lived this stuff for a number of years, I was intrigued.  Why would she publicly humiliate herself, especially knowing that no one could or would corroborate her tale? It’s not a normal thing. Worse, if true, why was no one from her family there to support her?  Not even her husband. Where was her mother?  My whole family was at every proceeding when I was wrongly charged, even when they kept moving me from court to court (outside of law) to prevent it.  Whey weren’t her people there to support her? Mine were. That may have been the most troubling thing--but also very telling, and I think we've figured out why.

So, here are some interesting items our investigators found that are not in the press:

  1. Dr. Christine Blasey-Ford has a rather significant holding in the company that makes the morning after abortion pill, making a swing vote on the Supreme Court, perhaps, important to her personally. This one does not impress me, but is worth mentioning as to motive for claiming a man tried to disrobe her at a party no one else remembers to keep him off the bench in case he would be stupid enough to overturn Roe v. Wade (which I don’t think he would be).
  2. She’s a professor at the same college in Palo Alto where Diane Feinstein’s husband, Richard Blum, is on the Board of Directors. OK, that wasn’t enough, but when we found out that she worked directly with Blum on the “resist Trump” movement for two years—that's different. Something is up. This was no accident and perhaps why the Feinsteins sat on the ‘letter’ for two months, with a finger in the wind to see if they needed to deploy her or not—cause she’s proven to be quite expensive.
  3. Blasey-Ford’s brother, Tom Blasey, worked for the DC law firm that funnelled the money from DNC/Clinton campaign to fund the anti-Trump “salacious and unverified” dossier, but I cannot find out if he was personally involved, so let’s write that one up to coincidence too. But…Blasey Ford’s brother, Tom, is also business partners with Jill Sztrok, cousin of Peter Strzok, in a company called Exelis Inc. which is more than a coincidence in my opinion.  Strzok—neck-deep in the Russia hoax business created to take Trump down in the unlikely event we ‘depolorables’ elected our man—and dumped from the FBI (which is nearly impossible)—well, I think that’s pretty big. 
  4. GoFundMe pages set up by Dems (Feinstein and Schumer’s operatives) the week before her appearance—and possibly the reason for her new-found fear of flying (waiting for this quid-pro-quo payment scheme to happen)—well, those funds are currently over a million—all hers—and still growing. Financial incentive was very strong and likely to be in the several millions, giving Christine a very strong incentive to fall on Brett's sword. We are unable to get the list of who put this fortune in her pocket, but it would seem very plausible that some guarantees were in place before she hopped on the jet to DC.
  5. Brett Kavanaugh’s mother, Judge Kavanaugh, presided over parts of the foreclosure proceedings of Christine Blasey-Ford’s parents’ home. Revenge motive? Shame, seeking a get-back? Perhaps.  I don’t know, but she definitely knew of Kavanaugh’s mother, though whether she knew the son is up from grabs (no pun intended). 
Still working on it, but thought this might be interesting. There just seem to be more and more facts coming out that make this look like a smear-- a last-ditch effort. As to why only a Hollywood Witch--what's her name--Alyssa Misandry?--​showed up and none of her family did to support her--I think we have that figured out as well. Mr. and Mrs. Blasey sitting beside Judge Martha Kavanaugh--the judge who presided over their home foreclosure proceedings--would have been picked up by somebody and made for grand theater that might have stolen air time from the smear show.  And what if her brother, Tom, Strzok family partner and lawyer in the firm that made  Russia Hoax payments to foreign spies for the Clintons and Dems--got busted for who he was or caused even the slightest investigation--well, that couldn't be allowed either.

That still leaves a big question as to why supportive Hubby did not show up--but maybe he's mad because he's not getting the GoFundMe money from the Feinstein/Schumer cabal too. Or maybe he doesn't believe her too. Anyway, it would have been smart of Feinsteins to buy him too, because with even one support person there for her other than the TV Misandrist witch--I never would have started digging.

Howell W. Woltz
International Centre for Justice
Warsaw, Poland
Author of "Restoring America: by returning to its Constitution" available on Amazon
2 Comments
<<Previous

    Author

    Born in North Carolina and educated at the University of Virginia, Wake Forest University and Caledonian University in Scotland, Howell now lives in Warsaw, Poland with his wife, Dr. Magdalena Iwaniec-Woltz. Howell is the European Correspondent for The Richardson Post and Chairman of The International Centre for Justice.

    Picture

    Archives

    December 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    January 2017
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014

    Categories

    All
    Blog
    Justice Denied Book
    Justice Denied Film
    News
    Ombudsman

    RSS Feed

Howell's story is our story

Contact Howell for editorial inquiries or speaking opportunities
JusticeRestored.com

Photography by David Rosen   |   Book jacket design by Rob Calvert
  • Home
  • Books
  • Film
  • His TEDX talk
  • Take Action
  • Contact
    • Press Releases
  • Blog
  • Epstein Log and Black Book